In the following we will assume that the errors in the RA and DEC are equal
and uncorrelated and follow a Gaussian distribution,
we can then write
.
For the expectation value of for a given
X-ray source we get:
Of course, in practice there will be chance coincidences. For chance coincidences the chance that an optical counter part will be within a distance from the source is (i.e. within an error circle of ). This gives for the expected value for a chance coincidence:
The number of chance coincidences can be estimated using poison statistics with a poison parameter of , with the average number of optical sources per unit area. The expected number of sources is thus (where the subscript denotes values for each X-ray source, thus allowing for fluctuations in the number of optical sources per area). The expected value for is:
How many counterparts do we need to discriminate between chance coincidences or real counter parts? This question is not easy to answer, as eposcorr optimizes and also for the number of counter parts. This means that Poissonian statistics may not be valid. To get at least an approximate answer, we equate:
XMM-Newton SOC -- 2023-04-16